Posts in AI

When the Algorithm Knocks: France Faces the Future of Work

« The future is already here — it’s just not evenly distributed. »
William Gibson

A quick pulse-check

Indicator (2023-25)Latest figureSource
French jobs fully automatable5 %Sénat
Jobs partly exposed to AI, advanced economies40 %IMF
French workers who fear net job losses from AI75 %Labo
Finance teams already piloting or running AI58 %Gartner
Industrial-robot density, France (2022)180 / 10 000 workersStatista
Teachers using AI tools regularly≈ 20 %Le Monde.fr

The big picture: task take-over, not job wipe-out

France’s own Artificial-Intelligence Commission delivered a sobering — and surprisingly modest — number last spring: only one job in twenty is “directly replaceable” by current AI. The rest will merely be reshuffled, split or augmented. Global-scale anxiety persists, of course: the IMF puts 40 % of jobs in rich economies inside AI’s blast radius, meaning at least one core task could be automated.IMF Yet evidence from INSEE panel data shows AI-adopting French firms hire slightly faster than laggards, because productivity windfalls fund fresh roles in data, compliance and design. (Creative destruction is still creative.)

Sector by sector: who should sweat?

SectorTasks on the chopping blockNew (or rising) skillsCurrent tremor level
Finance & adminReconciliations, invoice coding, vanilla risk scoringData literacy, model oversight, client storytellingHigh – 58 % of teams already run AI; clerical head-counts inch down. Gartner
ManufacturingRepetitive welding, materials handlingRobot maintenance, OT-IT cybersecurityMedium-high – 6 400 new robots in 2023; density still half Germany’s. IFR International Federation of Robotics
HealthScan annotation, appointment triageInterpreting AI outputs, patient-side empathyLow – staff shortages mean augmentation, not cuts.
EducationMarking drills, drafting worksheetsDigital pedagogy, prompt-craftLow-medium – only 20 % of teachers use AI so far. Le Monde.fr
Media & creativeStock copy, basic illustrationCuration, narrative craft, IP savvyMedium – generative-AI tools flood studios; junior roles feel the squeeze.

Why the figures matter

  • Finance is already living through what McKinsey calls the “augmented-analyst” era: AI now cranks out first-pass pitch books; junior bankers edit rather than build. Clerical attrition is real, but the demand for model auditors and prompt engineers is rising even faster.
  • In factories, France’s relatively modest robot density (180 per 10 000) is a cue, not cause for comfort. If Paris wants to “ré-industrialiser” without exporting jobs to cheaper shores, cobots and predictive-maintenance AI are table stakes.
  • Hospitals fear burnout more than bots. Radiologists welcome the second pair of silicon eyes; nurses cheer paperwork-eating NLP.
  • Classrooms risk a digital divide within the staffroom: unless ministries accelerate the promised AI-literacy charter, the pupils will outrun their profs.
  • For journalists and designers, the genie is not going back in the bottle; French unions have already filed clauses limiting uncredited synthetic content.

What the state is doing — and should still do

  1. Scale training: government pledges to funnel France 2030 cash into nine AI clusters and to push CPF-funded micro-courses in data and model governance. Good — now publish an annual scoreboard of how many clerks, welders and editors actually switched careers.
  2. Audit the algorithms: the forthcoming EU AI Act will require bias-testing for HR and productivity tools. France could go further and give works councils a veto on opaque “boss-ware”.
  3. Reward augmentation, not redundancy: offer tax credits for AI deployments that raise per-worker output without shrinking payrolls.
  4. Target regional safety nets: an algorithmic risk-map (down to département-level) would flag which towns dominated by call-centres or fulfilment hubs need retraining subsidies first.

The bottom line

When the algorithm knocks, most French jobs will not be shown the door; they will be shown a new desk. The threat is less mass unemployment than mass redeployment. Whether that feels like liberation or displacement depends on politics, boardroom choices — and a national willingness to learn faster than the machines.

OpenAI vs. DeepSeek: The Business Models Race

In just a few months, generative artificial intelligence has gone from a laboratory curiosity to the next big technological frontier. Behind the excitement surrounding solutions such as ChatGPT (developed by OpenAI, backed by Microsoft) and DeepSeek (a Chinese startup aiming to rival the American giants), lie colossal challenges: profitability, sovereignty, workforce training, and even climate impact. This chronicle offers an overview of the key figures in AI, then explores three economic scenarios likely to shape the global landscape of this revolution.


1. Key Figures: What They Mean for Households and Businesses

To better grasp the stakes, the table below presents three main themes—productivity gains, employment, and energy costs—along with their real-life implications for individuals and companies.

Productivity Gains: An Inexhaustible Gold Mine?Jobs: 25% “Disrupted,” 12 Million “Created”Energy Costs and Cloud Spending: The Great Challenge
What the Figures Say– McKinsey (2023) anticipates up to $4.4 trillion per year in added value from generative AI.
– Across the EU, this could theoretically support a 2% GDP increase if widely adopted.
– Goldman Sachs (2023): up to 25% of jobs “disrupted” by 2030 (administration, customer support).
– World Economic Forum (2023): 12 million new positions focused on AI systems design and maintenance.
– Synergy Research (2023): $500 billion in cloud investments by 2026, driven by AI.
– Training a model (e.g., GPT-4) can emit hundreds of tons of CO₂ (University of Massachusetts, 2023).
Points of Comparison– $4.4 trillion is more than Germany’s annual GDP (around $4 trillion).
– For an SME, potential benefits could be seen in accounting, customer relations, and automating repetitive tasks.
– 25% is one quarter of the workforce in key sectors (accounting, telemarketing, etc.).
– 12 million new jobs is almost the active population of countries like Belgium or Greece.
– $500 billion is more than double France’s total annual budget for Education and Research.
– The carbon footprint of training a single AI model can equal thousands of long-haul flights.
ImplicationsFor households: potential drop in certain service costs (insurance, banking, legal advice), as AI can reduce operational expenses.
For businesses: need to invest in staff training and IT infrastructure to capitalize on these gains.
For households: risk of unemployment for vulnerable profiles but opportunities for younger, data-savvy professionals.
For businesses: retraining and new professions (AI consultants, “prompt engineers,” etc.).
For households: if servers increasingly consume energy, electricity bills or service fees (online hosting, for instance) could rise over time.
For businesses: sustainability becomes a major factor (cost and brand image), prompting a push to reduce data center consumption.

2. From Promising Numbers to Economic Models: The Necessary Transition

The data above highlights the vast potential of generative AI while revealing significant disparities. Much like Amazon in its early days, neither OpenAI nor DeepSeek has found the holy grail of profitability yet, despite massive investments. One relies on platform effects (OpenAI is strongly tied to Microsoft Azure), while the other leans on cost-efficiency and government support (DeepSeek and the Chinese market).

In an ecosystem where data centers consume hundreds of billions of dollars and enterprise adoption may be slower than predicted, the central question becomes: how can generative AI be monetized effectively? The table showcases the magnitude of possible gains, but also the financial, human, and environmental costs. Recent tech history (Google, Facebook, etc.) reminds us that business models often emerge empirically, shaped by trial and error as well as partnerships.

In this vibrant context, three economic scenarios stand out—each offering a distinct path to turn innovation into sustainable revenue while addressing concerns of sovereignty, competition, and environmental accountability.


3. Three Economic Scenarios for the OpenAI-DeepSeek Rivalry

Scenario A: The “Google-Style” Advertising Model

  • Principle: Provide free or freemium versions, leverage user attention, and monetize via targeted advertising (or user data sales).
  • OpenAI might thus strengthen ChatGPT’s integration with search engines (e.g., Bing) or social media.
  • DeepSeek, backed by Beijing, could favor a model less reliant on advertising, possibly state-subsidized to ensure data sovereignty and security.

Scenario B: The “Premium Licensing” and B2B Model

  • Principle: Reserve advanced versions (GPT-5, GPT-6, etc.) for clients able to pay high subscription fees, such as banks, insurers, and large industrial groups.
  • OpenAI would cover infrastructure costs by charging for exclusive access to its most powerful models.
  • DeepSeek, for its part, might offer turnkey solutions to strategic national sectors (banks, hospitals, government agencies), capitalizing on an ecosystem less open to American providers.

Scenario C: Technological Breakthrough and Cost Reduction

  • Principle: Simultaneously, advancements in AI hardware (dedicated chips) or training optimization (quantization, model distillation) could drastically reduce energy consumption.
  • Democratization Effect: Much like personal computers in the 1990s, declining unit costs would open generative AI to a wider range of players (SMEs, emerging countries), lowering entry barriers and pushing OpenAI and DeepSeek to stand out via product innovation rather than sheer infrastructure capabilities.

A Revolution to Be Invented

Between promises of productivity and risks of polarization (impacting employment and resources), generative AI finds itself at a turning point for the global economy. OpenAI and DeepSeek are its most publicized faces, yet they only represent the tip of a vast movement affecting every sector and raising fundamental questions: Who will finance the transition? How will the benefits be distributed? What rules will govern the geostrategic and environmental facets of AI adoption?

The numbers speak to a major economic opportunity, but the history of tech pioneers (Amazon, Google, Microsoft…) shows that profitability rarely follows a simple or rapid path. The scenarios outlined here illustrate the diversity of possible approaches—each with its pros and cons. As AI becomes embedded in our daily lives, this Sino-American rivalry underscores the need to craft, sometimes from scratch, a sustainable model that is both profitable and socially responsible.

Main References

  1. McKinsey (2023).
    The Economic Potential of Generative AI.
    https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/the-economic-potential-of-generative-ai-the-next-productivity-frontier
  2. Goldman Sachs (2023).
    Generative AI Could Raise Global GDP by 7%.
    https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/pages/generative-ai-could-raise-global-gdp-by-7-percent.html
  3. Synergy Research (2023).
    Cloud Market Reports.
    https://www.synergyresearchgroup.com/
  4. World Economic Forum (2023).
    Future of Jobs Report.
    https://www.weforum.org/reports
  5. University of Massachusetts (2023).
    Estimating CO₂ Emissions of LLMs (Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning).
    https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.02243
  6. OECD (2024).
    SMEs and the Adoption of AI.
    https://www.oecd.org/going-digital/smes-and-the-adoption-of-ai/
  7. Reuters (2025).
    DeepSeek and Its Disruptive AI Model.
    https://www.reuters.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/what-is-deepseek-why-is-it-disrupting-ai-sector-2025-01-27/

DeepSeek’s $6M AI Revolution: How It Outpaces GPT-4

There are moments in history when the rules of the game change, and they do so unexpectedly. DeepSeek, a modest Chinese startup founded in 2023, has achieved the impossible: challenging the giants of artificial intelligence with a model that is revolutionary, open source, and… affordable. This is not just a technical innovation but a fundamental disruption of Silicon Valley’s dominance.


A Direct Challenge to OpenAI

DeepSeek R1, their first reasoning AI model, was designed with a clear ambition: to rival OpenAI’s GPT-4. But what’s truly astonishing is not just its performance—it’s the ridiculously low cost in comparison.

Consider GPT-4, OpenAI’s flagship model, which required over $600 million to train. In contrast, DeepSeek R1 was developed with just $6 million, or 1/100th of the cost. And that’s not all: while OpenAI charges more than $100 per million tokens, DeepSeek R1 delivers the same performance for under $4.

This is no longer just a difference—it’s a chasm. But DeepSeek didn’t stop there. Unlike GPT-4, their model is open source, with a permissive license, allowing anyone to access, modify, or deploy it freely.


A Market in Panic

DeepSeek’s announcement didn’t just stir investors—it caused a genuine shockwave across technology markets. Companies like NVIDIA have reportedly lost over $500 billion in market capitalization, as concerns grow about the viability of expensive GPUs in a new era where AI training can be done more economically.

Silicon Valley, long regarded as the uncontested leader in AI, now finds itself on the defensive. DeepSeek R1, described by some as the « Sputnik moment for AI, » is shifting the strategic advantage toward China.


A User Experience That Delivers

Early users of DeepSeek R1 report remarkable performance. Where the model excels is in its ability to provide transparent reasoning, a domain where even OpenAI’s models sometimes struggle. The model explains its reasoning steps, opening up new possibilities for applications in fields like law, medicine, and education.

However, some users note that DeepSeek R1 still lags slightly in tasks requiring high nuance or creativity, such as literary writing. That said, the fact that it is open source could accelerate its refinement by the community.


A Technological and Geopolitical Revolution

Beyond the technical innovation, DeepSeek represents a significant geopolitical shift. China is proving that it can not only catch up in artificial intelligence but also set new industry standards.

But this also raises questions:

  • How will the West respond? A widespread adoption of DeepSeek’s technologies could reshape global AI governance.
  • What does this mean for emerging countries? With such reduced costs, nations previously excluded from the AI race could position themselves as new players.

A Disruption Worth Watching

DeepSeek R1 is not just a model; it’s a paradigm shift. It pushes the global tech community to rethink how AI models are built, shared, and used. This is not just a technological challenge but also a reevaluation of the economic and geopolitical structures that have shaped AI so far.

The big question now is simple: can Silicon Valley reinvent itself? The answer will unfold in the coming months, or perhaps weeks.


Sources

Africa Joins the Global Race for Artificial Intelligence

In the global competition to dominate artificial intelligence (AI), all eyes are on the United States and China, locked in a titanic battle fuelled by billions of dollars. Yet, in the shadow of these giants, an unexpected contender is stepping into the arena: Africa. Often stereotyped as a region of aid dependence and underdevelopment, the continent is now making waves in AI innovation. And trust me, the Americans and Chinese would be wise to pay attention.


The Big Players: The US and China Compete for Supremacy

On one side, you have the United States with its well-oiled money machine. OpenAI, Google, Microsoft – the usual suspects. These companies attract the brightest minds like moths to a flame, with government support in the form of a staggering $500 billion investment to maintain dominance. Part of this effort includes a mega data centre in Texas, a project that screams Silicon Valley on steroids.

On the other side, there’s China, which never does things halfway. Its ambition is clear: to surpass the US. Its secret weapon? DeepSeek, a startup already challenging American heavyweights. Backed by government funding, China has set an ambitious goal to lead the world in AI by 2030 – and they mean business.


Europe: Too Much Talk, Too Little Action

Meanwhile, Europe does what it does best: talk. Its AI Act, adopted in 2024, is a gold standard for ethics and regulation. Bravo, Europe – you’re the teacher reminding everyone to play by the rules. But while it pats itself on the back for creating a legal framework, the Americans and Chinese keep playing the game. The result? Europe is stuck watching the race from the sidelines.


Africa: Frugal Innovation at Its Best

Where things get interesting is Africa’s entrance into the match. Not with billions, but with ideas. The continent isn’t trying to match the astronomical budgets of the superpowers; instead, it’s focused on solving real problems.

Agriculture and Environment: Solving the Essentials

Take Zenvus, a Nigerian startup that helps farmers analyse soil to maximise yields. Or M-Situ in Kenya, which uses AI to combat deforestation by detecting chainsaw noise and fires, alerting rangers in real-time. While others fantasise about self-driving cars, Africa tackles hunger and natural resource preservation. Priorities, anyone?

Health and Education: Meeting Critical Needs

Rwanda is not just a development success story; it’s also becoming an AI pioneer. With Ircad Africa, the country trains doctors in cutting-edge surgical techniques using AI. In Ghana, SuaCode makes programming education accessible to thousands with nothing more than a smartphone. While Silicon Valley sells $1,000 gadgets, Africa is democratising access.


African Languages: Culture Gets a Boost

What about African languages? In 2024, Google Translate added 31 new African languages, including Wolof and Baoulé. This is a big deal. It shows that AI can also be a tool for cultural preservation. Africa isn’t just catching up; it’s putting its culture and priorities at the forefront.


The Moral of the Story: A Quiet Revolution

So, what does Africa’s rise in AI teach us? That innovation isn’t just about billions of dollars or patent filings. It’s about real impact on people’s lives. And in this area, Africa has plenty to offer.

The race for AI isn’t just a technological arms race. It’s a battle to define the future. While the giants clash with supercomputers and massive budgets, Africa is proving it can be a key player by playing on its terms. The US and China would do well to stop looking over the continent’s shoulder and start paying attention to what’s happening on the ground. Because, believe me, this African revolution, quiet but impactful, is just getting started.

L’Afrique s’invite dans la course mondiale à l’intelligence artificielle

Dans la compétition mondiale pour dominer l’intelligence artificielle (IA), les projecteurs sont rivés sur les États-Unis et la Chine, qui se livrent un duel de titans à coups de milliards. Pourtant, à l’ombre de ces géants, un outsider inattendu se fait une place dans l’arène : l’Afrique. Oui, ce continent souvent relégué aux stéréotypes de l’aide humanitaire et du sous-développement technologique fait aujourd’hui vibrer les radars de l’innovation avec ses propres solutions d’IA. Et croyez-moi, les Américains et les Chinois feraient bien de prêter attention.


Les Big Boys : États-Unis et Chine jouent aux surenchères

D’un côté, les États-Unis, avec leur machine à cash bien huilée. OpenAI, Google, Microsoft – vous connaissez leurs noms. Ces entreprises attirent les cerveaux les plus brillants comme des papillons vers une lumière ultraviolette. Le gouvernement américain injecte 500 milliards de dollars pour asseoir sa domination, avec un projet spectaculaire : un centre de données gigantesque au Texas. C’est tout simplement Hollywood version tech.

De l’autre côté, la Chine. Ce pays n’a jamais fait dans la demi-mesure, et son ambition est limpide : dépasser les États-Unis. Leur arme secrète ? DeepSeek, une start-up qui rivalise déjà avec les géants américains. Soutenue par le gouvernement, la Chine s’est fixé une deadline ambitieuse : être numéro un mondial de l’IA d’ici 2030. Et ils ne bluffent pas.


L’Europe : Trop de discussions, pas assez d’actions

Pendant ce temps, l’Europe fait ce qu’elle sait faire de mieux : discuter. Certes, son AI Act, adopté en 2024, est un modèle d’éthique. Bravo, l’Europe est le prof qui rappelle qu’il faut respecter les règles du jeu. Mais pendant qu’elle s’applaudit pour son cadre législatif, les Américains et les Chinois continuent de jouer, eux. Le résultat ? L’Europe se retrouve à regarder la compétition depuis les gradins.


Et l’Afrique dans tout ça ? L’innovation frugale au service du continent

Là où l’histoire devient intéressante, c’est quand l’Afrique entre dans le match. Pas avec des milliards, mais avec des idées. Car le continent ne cherche pas à rivaliser avec les budgets astronomiques des superpuissances, mais plutôt à résoudre des problèmes concrets.

Agriculture et environnement : Les vraies priorités

Prenez Zenvus, une start-up nigériane qui aide les agriculteurs à analyser leur sol pour maximiser les rendements. Ou encore M-Situ, au Kenya, qui utilise l’IA pour lutter contre la déforestation en détectant les bruits de tronçonneuses et les incendies. Pendant que certains fantasment sur des voitures autonomes, l’Afrique s’attaque à la faim et à la préservation de ses ressources naturelles. Priorités, non ?

Santé et éducation : Là où ça compte

Le Rwanda n’est pas seulement un exemple de développement, il devient aussi un pionnier en IA. Avec Ircad Africa, le pays forme des médecins à des techniques de chirurgie de pointe grâce à l’intelligence artificielle. Et au Ghana, SuaCode rend l’apprentissage de la programmation accessible à tous avec… un simple smartphone. Pendant que la Silicon Valley vend ses gadgets à 1 000 dollars, l’Afrique joue la carte de la démocratisation.


Les langues africaines : La culture entre dans la danse

Et que dire des langues africaines ? En 2024, Google Traduction a intégré 31 nouvelles langues africaines, dont le wolof et le baoulé. Une avancée qui montre que l’IA peut aussi être un outil de préservation culturelle. Car oui, l’Afrique ne veut pas seulement rattraper son retard, elle veut le faire à sa manière, en mettant ses cultures et ses besoins au centre.


La morale de l’histoire : Une révolution silencieuse

Alors, que nous apprend cette montée en puissance de l’Afrique ? Que l’innovation ne se mesure pas uniquement en milliards de dollars ou en nombre de brevets déposés. Elle se mesure aussi à l’impact réel sur la vie des gens. Et dans ce domaine, l’Afrique a des leçons à donner.

La course à l’IA n’est pas une simple bataille technologique. C’est une lutte pour définir à quoi ressemblera notre futur. Pendant que les géants s’affrontent à coups de supercalculateurs et de budgets pharaoniques, l’Afrique prouve qu’elle peut être un acteur clé en jouant selon ses propres règles. Les États-Unis et la Chine feraient bien d’arrêter de regarder par-dessus l’épaule du continent et de prêter attention à ce qui s’y passe. Parce que, croyez-moi, cette révolution africaine, silencieuse mais percutante, ne fait que commencer.